Skip to content

[JS] Exclude JS flatten for services that have already been released #39459

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
v-jiaodi wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

[JS] Exclude JS flatten for services that have already been released #39459

v-jiaodi wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

@v-jiaodi
Copy link
Member

@v-jiaodi v-jiaodi commented Jan 6, 2026

related issue: Azure/autorest.typescript#3644
In order to prevent introducing breaking changes, exclude JS flatten for services that have already been released.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 6, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Next Steps to Merge

Next steps that must be taken to merge this PR:
  • ❌ This PR targets either the main branch of the public specs repo or the RPSaaSMaster branch of the private specs repo. These branches are not intended for iterative development. Therefore, you must acknowledge you understand that after this PR is merged, the APIs are considered shipped to Azure customers. Any further attempts at in-place modifications to the APIs will be subject to Azure's versioning and breaking change policies. Additionally, for control plane APIs, you must acknowledge that you are following all the best practices documented by ARM at aka.ms/armapibestpractices. If you do intend to release the APIs to your customers by merging this PR, add the PublishToCustomers label to your PR in acknowledgement of the above. Otherwise, retarget this PR onto a feature branch, i.e. with prefix release- (see aka.ms/azsdk/api-versions#release--branches).


Comment generated by summarize-checks workflow run.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 6, 2026 •
edited
Loading

API Change Check

APIView identified API level changes in this PR and created the following API reviews

Language API Review for Package
TypeSpec Microsoft.Chaos
TypeSpec Microsoft.CodeSigning
TypeSpec Microsoft.Dashboard
TypeSpec Microsoft.HardwareSecurityModules
TypeSpec Microsoft.NetApp
TypeSpec Microsoft.Quota
TypeSpec Microsoft.RecoveryServices
TypeSpec Microsoft.StorageActions
TypeSpec Microsoft.StorageMover
Go sdk/resourcemanager/chaos/armchaos
Go sdk/resourcemanager/netapp/armnetapp
Go sdk/resourcemanager/quota/armquota
Go sdk/resourcemanager/recoveryservices/armrecoveryservices
Go sdk/resourcemanager/dashboard/armdashboard
Go sdk/resourcemanager/storagemover/armstoragemover
Java com.azure.resourcemanager:azure-resourcemanager-chaos
Java com.azure.resourcemanager:azure-resourcemanager-netapp
Java com.azure.resourcemanager:azure-resourcemanager-trustedsigning
Java com.azure.resourcemanager:azure-resourcemanager-dashboard
Java com.azure.resourcemanager:azure-resourcemanager-storageactions
Java com.azure.resourcemanager:azure-resourcemanager-storagemover
JavaScript @azure/arm-chaos
JavaScript @azure/arm-hardwaresecuritymodules
JavaScript @azure/arm-netapp
JavaScript @azure/arm-quota
JavaScript @azure/arm-recoveryservices
JavaScript @azure/arm-trustedsigning
JavaScript @azure/arm-dashboard
JavaScript @azure/arm-storageactions
JavaScript @azure/arm-storagemover
Python azure-mgmt-chaos
Python azure-mgmt-hardwaresecuritymodules
Python azure-mgmt-netapp
Python azure-mgmt-quota
Python azure-mgmt-recoveryservices
Python azure-mgmt-trustedsigning
Python azure-mgmt-dashboard
Python azure-mgmt-storageactions
Python azure-mgmt-storagemover

@v-jiaodi
Copy link
Member Author

v-jiaodi commented Jan 7, 2026

storagemover sample issue track: Azure/autorest.typescript#3673

@v-jiaodi v-jiaodi marked this pull request as ready for review January 20, 2026 08:11
@github-actions github-actions bot added ARMReview WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Jan 20, 2026
@psah434 psah434 added the ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review label Jan 20, 2026
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Jan 20, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@qiaozha qiaozha qiaozha approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

ARMReview ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review BreakingChange-Go-Sdk BreakingChange-JavaScript-Sdk BreakingChange-Python-Sdk BreakingChange-Python-Sdk-Approved RecoveryServices resource-manager TypeSpec Authored with TypeSpec

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@v-jiaodi @qiaozha @psah434 @ChenxiJiang333